ty pr

Raoul Moati

Moati

Raoul Moati received his PHD from the University of Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne, where he taught for several years. He is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Philosophy of the University of Chicago. He is also an Associate Member of the Husserl Archive (Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris) and of the Institute Marcel Mauss at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales (EHESS). Raoul Moati works and teaches principally in Phenomenology, Continental Philosophy, Philosophy of Language and Metaphysics.
His work primarily deals with the philosophical conflict between Deconstruction and  Ordinary Language Philosophy. His first book (Derrida/Searle, deconstruction et langage ordinaire) focuses on Derrida’s and Searle’s controversy about Austin. A systematic work on Derrida and the Ordinary Language (Derrida et le langage ordinaire) is to be published in 2014.
In the most recent phase of his work, Raoul Moati tries to challenge the continental claim of the so-called “End of Metaphysics”. For Moati this deconstructive claim is based on a questionable understanding of the concept of Metaphysics. Moati tries to problematize this question in his latest book, which consists in a very close reading of Levinas’s masterpiece Totality and Infinity (Evénements Nocturnes, Essai sur Totalité et Infini).

CV (DOC)

Raoul Moati's recorded lecture(s).

Contact

email: rmoati@uchicago.edu
phone: 773.702.8656
Office: Stuart Hall 205
Office Hours Winter quarter: Mon 4:00-6:00

on leave Spring 2014

 

Books                                                                

  • Derrida/Searle, déconstruction et langage ordinaire, has been translated into the English version Derrida/Searle: Deconstruction and Ordinary Language and published by Columbia University Press, 2014.
  • Derrida et le langage ordinaire, Paris, Hermann, 2014 Link
  • Evénements Nocturnes, Essai sur Totalité et Infini, Preface by J. Benoist, Paris, Hermann, « Le bel aujourd’hui », 2012. PDF
  • Žižek, Marxisme et Psychanalyse, with Ronan de Calan, Paris, PUF, « Philosophies », 2012.
  • Derrida/Searle, déconstruction et langage ordinaire, Paris, PUF, « Philosophies », 2009.
  • Autour de Slavoj Žižek, Psychanalyse, Marxisme, Idéalisme Allemand, (ed.), Paris, PUF, « Actuel Marx », 2010.

Selected Publications in French

  • "Phénoménologie et dialectique" in J. Benoist and M. Espagne, L'itinéraire de Tran Duc Thao, Phénoménologie et Transfert culturels, Paris, Armand Colin, Recherches. PDF
  • "Structure et liberté" in G.F. Duportail Penser avec Lacan, Nouvelles lectures, Paris, Hermann, 2014. PDF
  • Contextualité et déconstruction in D. Cohen-Levinas et G. Michaud (eds.), Lectures de J. Derrida, Paris, Hermann, à paraître, 2014. PDF
  • “L’intentionalité à l’envers”, in Europe 991-992, Emmanuel Levinas, November-December, 2011. PDF
  • Langage ordinaire et vouloir dire: Stanley Cavell défenseur critique d’Austin (in La philosophie du langage ordinaire Histoire et actualité de la philosophie d’Oxford Christophe Al-Saleh & Sandra Laugier (Eds.), Olms, 2011) .docx
  •  “Le prisme descriptiviste de la théorie des actes de langage de J.R. Searle”, in Sandra Laugier and Sabine Plaud (Eds.), Lectures de la philosophie analytique, Paris, Ellipses, 2011. PDF
  • “De l’intentionnalité à la pulsionalité, la subjectivation du Todestrieb” in Studia Phaenomenologica, Volume X, December 2010. PDF

Selected Forthcoming Publications

  • Derrida et le langage ordinaire, Paris, Hermann, « Le bel aujourd’hui », forthcoming, 2014.

Selected Reviews of Raoul Moati’s Work

Courses

PHIL 23408/33408. Introduction to Being and Time. (=FNDL 23408) The aim of this course will be to introduce to one of the most important and discussed work pertaining to the continental field of the Philosophy of the XXth Century: Heidegger's Being and Time. Our course will be structured by two main movements. On the one hand we will introduce to the main and fundamental concepts developed by Heidegger in his work through analytic sessions devoted to the most important sections of Sein und Zeit. On the other hand, we will follow the way Sein und Zeit was received and discussed in the field of French Contemporary Continental Philosophy - especially through Derrida's and Levinas's interpretations and discussions of Sein und Zeit. The double structure of our itinerary obeys to a philosophical necessity which will take the form of a leading question: is it possible to think beyond the primacy of the horizon of Being - drawn by Heidegger in Sein und Zeit - anything like an "Otherwise than Being"? And if so, we will have to elucidate why and in what sense such an alternative horizon of sense does not entails the abandonment of the Heideggerian Question of Being, but leads, on the contrary, to the full explanation of the background without which the Question of Being raised by Sein und Zeit becomes unintelligible. Winter 2015.

PHIL 56205. Radical Immanence. This course will be based on a direct confrontation between Sartre’s and Michel Henry’s phenomenological works. The main goal of this course will be to reintroduce the concept of immanence in a phenomenological sense beyond its critique by the philosophies of existence – of the so-called extatic dimension of human existence. The main goal of this course will be then to introduce two Sartre’s and Michel Henry’s phenomenological masterpieces (mainly Sartre’s The Transcendence of the Ego (la Transcendance de l’Ego) and Henry’s The Essence of Manifestation  (L’Essence de la manifestation)). Does the discovery of our intentional or existential openness to the world implies necessarily the renunciation to the notion of immanence or do we have to elaborate a phenomenological meaning for the concept of immanence in order to go further in the comprehension of the transcendent nature of our being? This will be the leading question of our seminar. Autumn 2014.

23411/33411. Being, Time and Otherness. This course will be devoted to two early Essays of Levinas, Time and Other and Existence and Existents. We will try to situate these two works in the context of the French reception of German Existentialism. The major goal of this course will be to show that the concept of Otherness in Levinas’s philosophy does not entail a simple abandonment of the Heideggerian “ontological difference” but lies in a new deduction of it that entails a new concept of Time, beyond its ontological (and Heideggerian) meaning. We will try to explain how this new deduction of the ontological difference is based on the elucidation of phenomenological events that remain hidden to the so-called “phenomenological reduction” and that requires a reform of the phenomenological method that Levinas inherits from Husserl and Heidegger. Thanks to this new method, Phenomenology can be accomplished as an investigation that is able to go beyond intentional objects. Autumn 2013.

54805. The Concept of Metaphysics: Heidegger, Levinas, Derrida. This course will be devoted to the confrontation of two of the most important masterpieces of Continental Philosophy: Being and Time of Heidegger and Totality and Infinity of Levinas. In this course we shall try first to focus on the Heideggerian project of a “deconstruction of the metaphysics of presence”. Against Heidegger, Levinas maintains that ontology cannot be fundamental—the question of being at the core of Heidegger's project cannot just be directed to one's own tacit understanding of being.  If the question of being is an actual question, its addressee must be an Other.  Levinas teaches that metaphysical experience of otherness cannot be captured in Heideggerian fundamental ontology. Nevertheless, Derrida in “Violence and Metaphysics” challenges Levinas’s idea of a Metaphysical Experience that could be entirely free of  Ontology and Phenomenality (in the Heidegger's senses of these terms). Against Levinas he defends the the idea that the Other cannot be identified to a Metaphysical Presence (as it is for Levinas) but necessarily coincides with an Absence and a Trace. We will try to identify and to criticize such a reduction of the Levinas' Metaphysics to the so-called "Metaphysics of Presence" identified and deconstructed by Heidegger and Derrida. Through the analysis of the philosophical conflicts between Heidegger, Levinas and Derrida about metaphysics, the fundamental goal of this course will be to defend a sense for Metaphysics after the so-called “End of Metaphysics". Autumn 2013.

23205. Introduction to Phenomenology. The aim of this course is to introduce students to one of the most important and influential traditions in the European Philosophy of the 20th Century: Phenomenology. The main task of this course will be to present Phenomenology’s main concepts and the meaning of Phenomenology’s transformations from Husserl to Heidegger, Sartre, Levinas and Henry.

The fundamental credo of Phenomenology consists in the emphasis laid upon phenomena given to consciousness. This emphasis coincides with the “return to things in themselves” as formulated by Husserl. What can this kind of return actually mean? And what does this claim suggest about philosophical practices prior to phenomenology, idealism or empiricism? In what way, for Husserl, was classical philosophy not able to give access to things such as they are truly given ? And what is the meaning of such idea of « givenness » ? Does Phenomenology fall into the so-called « myth of the Given » ?
No future phenomenologists after Husserl will question the fundamental idea of returning to things in themselves thanks to the phenomenological importance given to phenomena, but they will question the privilege of intentional consciousness postulated by Husserl - Heidegger will expand phenomenology to the ancient question of “Being” (thanks to the existential clarification of the Husserlian concept of Intentionality) and Levinas will question Husserl’s and Heidegger’s approaches of phenomenology - intentional and existential - as falling into the Western problem of Ontology and Totality against Otherness and Ethics. As we will see, even if Phenomenology coincides with the philosophical description of our "Openness to Exteriority", this openness - Intentional, Existential or Ethical - entails necessarily not the abandonment, but a radical redefinition of the concept of Subjective Immanence." Winter 2014.

27000. History of Philosophy III. German Idealism. PQ: Completion of the general education requirement in humanities. This course is an introduction to German Idealism, through readings of Kant’s first and second Critiques, Fichte’s Vocation of the Scholar and Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. We will focus especially on the concept of “recognition” and examine why for Kant and Fichte the social recognition - the recognition of the Other as a free agent - becomes intelligible thanks to practical reason. Once this background clarified, we will then discuss Hegel’s famous “Master-Slave Dialectic” and try to explain the meaning of the so-called “struggle for recognition” in the economy of the Phenomenology of Spirit. Winter 2014.